Dissent and the Supreme Court: its role in the Court's history and the nation's constitutional dialogue

Book Cover
Average Rating
Publisher:
Varies, see individual formats and editions
Pub. Date:
Varies, see individual formats and editions
Language:
English
Description
From the admired judicial authority, author of Louis D. Brandeis ("Remarkable"--Anthony Lewis, The New York Review of Books; "Monumental"--Alan M. Dershowitz, The New York Times Book Review ), Division and Discord, and Supreme Decisions --Melvin Urofsky's major new book looks at the role of dissent in the Supreme Court and the meaning of the Constitution through the greatest and longest lasting public-policy debate in the country's history, among members of the Supreme Court, between the Court and the other branches of government, and between the Court and the people of the United States. Urofsky writes of the necessity of constitutional dialogue as one of the ways in which we as a people reinvent and reinvigorate our democratic society. In Dissent and the Supreme Court, he explores the great dissents throughout the Court's 225-year history. He discusses in detail the role the Supreme Court has played in helping to define what the Constitution means, how the Court's majority opinions have not always been right, and how the dissenters, by positing alternative interpretations, have initiated a critical dialogue about what a particular decision should mean. This dialogue is sometimes resolved quickly; other times it may take decades before the Court adjusts its position. Louis Brandeis's dissenting opinion about wiretapping became the position of the Court four decades after it was written. The Court took six decades to adopt the dissenting opinion of the first Justice John Harlan in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)--that segregation on the basis of race violated the Constitution--in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Urofsky shows that the practice of dissent grew slowly but steadily and that in the nineteenth century dissents became more frequent. In the (in)famous case of Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857), Chief Justice Roger Taney's opinion upheld slavery, declaring that blacks could never be citizens. The justice received intense condemnations from several of his colleagues, but it took a civil war and three constitutional amendments before the dissenting view prevailed and Dred Scott was overturned. Urofsky looks as well at the many aspects of American constitutional life that were affected by the Earl Warren Court--free speech, race, judicial appointment, and rights of the accused--and shows how few of these decisions were unanimous, and how the dissents in the earlier cases molded the results of later decisions; how with Roe v. Wade --the Dred Scott of the modern era--dissent fashioned subsequent decisions, and how, in the Court, a dialogue that began with the dissents in Roe has shaped every decision since. Urofsky writes of the rise of conservatism and discusses how the resulting appointments of more conservative jurists to the bench put the last of the Warren liberals--William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall--in increasingly beleaguered positions, and in the minority. He discusses the present age of incivility, in which reasoned dialogue seems less and less possible. Yet within the Marble Palace, the members of the Supreme Court continue to hear arguments, vote, and draft majority opinions, while the minority continues to "respectfully dissent." The Framers understood that if a constitution doesn't grow and adapt, it atrophies and dies, and if it does, so does the democratic society it has supported. Dissent--on the Court and off, Urofsky argues--has been a crucial ingredient in keeping the Constitution alive and must continue to be so. (With black-and-white illustrations throughout.)
Also in This Series
More Like This
More Details
ISBN:
9780307379405
9781101870631
030737940
Reviews from GoodReads
Loading GoodReads Reviews.
Staff View

Grouping Information

Grouped Work ID c9fb55a8-3f56-e927-c65b-00b774c4bb66
Grouping Title dissent and the supreme court its role in the courts history and the nations constitutional dialogue
Grouping Author urofsky melvin i
Grouping Category book
Last Grouping Update 2018-10-19 22:52:58PM
Last Indexed 2018-10-20 00:13:46AM

Solr Details

accelerated_reader_interest_level
accelerated_reader_point_value 0
accelerated_reader_reading_level 0
author Melvin I. Urofsky
author_display Urofsky, Melvin I
available_at_catalog Main Kids, Main Library
collection_catalog Non-Fiction
detailed_location_catalog Main Library - Adult Non-Fiction
display_description "Melvin Urofsky's major new book looks at the role of dissent in the Supreme Court and the meaning of the Constitution through the greatest and longest lasting public-policy debate in the country's history, among members of the Supreme Court, between the Court and the other branches of government, and between the Court and the people of the United States"--Dust jacket.
format_catalog Book, eBook
format_category_catalog Books, eBook
id c9fb55a8-3f56-e927-c65b-00b774c4bb66
isbn 030737940, 9780307379405, 9781101870631
item_details ils:CARL0000470491|35192048008860|Main Library - Adult Non-Fiction|342.73029 U78d|||1|false|false|||||On Shelf||MN||, overdrive:bb88654f-cc4d-4972-bdac-551e4bf2d5d7|-1|Online OverDrive Collection|Online OverDrive|eBook|eBook|1|false|true|OverDrive|||Adobe EPUB eBook,Kindle Book,OverDrive Read|Available Online||||
itype_catalog , Book
last_indexed 2018-10-20T05:13:46.741Z
lexile_score -1
literary_form Non Fiction
literary_form_full Non Fiction
local_callnumber_catalog 342.73029 U78d
owning_library_catalog Nashville Public Library
owning_location_catalog Main Kids, Main Library
primary_isbn 9780307379405
publishDate 2015
record_details ils:CARL0000470491|Book|Books|First edition.|English|Pantheon Books,|[2015]|xiii, 528 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm., overdrive:bb88654f-cc4d-4972-bdac-551e4bf2d5d7|eBook|eBook||English|Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group|2015|
recordtype grouped_work
scoping_details_catalog
Bib IdItem IdGrouped StatusStatusLocally OwnedAvailableHoldableBookableIn Library Use OnlyLibrary OwnedHoldable PTypesBookable PTypesLocal Url
overdrive:bb88654f-cc4d-4972-bdac-551e4bf2d5d7 -1 Available Online Available Online false true true false false false
ils:CARL0000470491 35192048008860 On Shelf On Shelf false true true false false true
subject_facet Constitutional law -- United States, Dissenting opinions -- United States, Judicial opinions -- United States, United States. -- Supreme Court
title_display Dissent and the Supreme Court : its role in the Court's history and the nation's constitutional dialogue
title_full Dissent and the Supreme Court : its role in the Court's history and the nation's constitutional dialogue / Melvin I. Urofsky, Dissent and the Supreme Court Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue
title_short Dissent and the Supreme Court :
title_sub its role in the Court's history and the nation's constitutional dialogue
topic_facet Constitutional law, Dissenting opinions, Judicial opinions, Law, Nonfiction